Answers
i bought a long option on company "A" for $1000, it will expire on 06/2010. the company went bankcrupted. so the option is worthless. therefore how can i report this loss on my irs tax return for this year 2009
F&O basic
Like diving capabilities when coming to a lake you don't want to drive around.
or ejection seat for people who eat in my car!
A push button paintball gun that when activated telescopes out & sprays paint on cars that won't get out of my way.
would be great help, plz advise what is the reason of certain shares to be traded in the Premium.
futures contract is an agreement between buyer and seller to buy or sell a particular asset (eg shares) some time in the future at a price agreed today. Futures contracts may be cash-settled or require physical delivery of the underlying asset. For equity futures, a cash-settled contract requires a cash amount to be paid on the settlement day, reflecting the difference between the initial futures price and the price of the underlying shares when the futures contract reaches maturity. In doing this, the investor can buy and sell contracts without ever owning the shares in the first place. This aspect is often quite attractive to investors because it prevents them from paying stamp duty which they would otherwise have to pay if they were trading shares.
Options give investors the right, but not the obligation to buy or sell a particular asset (eg shares) at a fixed price on or before a specific date. Unlike futures contracts, the potential loss to the buyer of an option is limited to the initial price (or premium) paid for the contract, regardless of the performance of the underlying share. Like futures, options can be used to try to capitalise on an upward or downward movement in the market, but also generate returns in a static market.
How do futures and options work?
Like insurance allows the owner of a car to protect their asset for a premium, futures and options allow investors to protect their investments. For example, suppose a fund manager knows they will have a certain amount of money to invest in shares at a fixed time in the future, but they believe the market is going to rise and there is a risk they will have to pay a lot more for the shares. They can purchase options on the same shares for a relatively small outlay (called a premium), and use the profit from the options to offset the higher price they would have to pay for the shares when the money becomes available. Because the amount of money that can be made or lost varies between product, three examples have been provided to give an indication of the potential of trading futures and options.
Universal Stock Futures For Universal Stock Futures on UK stocks, the profit/loss is £10 per penny move in the futures price. For example, if an investor buys one HSBC Universal Stock Future at 750p, and the market rises to 770p, they can sell for a 20p gain = £200 (£10x20). If however, they had of sold short initially, the loss would have been £200.
For European Universal Stock Futures, the profit/loss is €1 per €0.01 move in the futures price. For US Universal Stock Futures, the profit/loss is US$1 per US$0.01 move in the futures price.
FTSE 100 Index FutureFor FTSE 100 Index Futures, the profit/loss is £10 per index point move in the futures price.
Equity Options For Equity Options, the premium paid/received is £10 per penny. Unlike futures, if the investor buys an option, the maximum loss is limited to the initial premium paid.
...Does it matter that God lives also in the future for your option to be, option 1?
I will let you think what is my point so you can get the point of this?
Need ideas for possible energy production options for the United states in the future. What is their best option for efficient energy production?
Well currently projects are underway for a clean burning coal...the carbons are removed and so they do not pollute, these are very feasible in the near future because they would be fairly similar to gas and so the whole infrastructure wouldn't have to change as well as coal is something that this country has a lot of and so it would be a domestic product that would reduce our dependency on the middle east...
Pelosi pivots to center on healthcare -- is this what the Founders had in mind?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caved this morning, conceding to centrist realities, abandoning the "robust" public option for healthcare that she had trumpeted all year.
Eager to get those Blue Dog Democrats on board, to get her 218 votes in the House, Pelosi unveiled the House version of healthcare. Standing on the west steps of the U.S. Capitol in front of many members of the Democratic caucus, Pelosi hailed this plan as a major step forward, one with a public option, albeit not based on a Medicare formula but featuring rates negotiated with insurance companies.
"For nearly a century, leaders of every party and political philosophy have fought for health insurance reform," she said. "Today, we are on the cusp of delivering on the promise of making affordable, quality health insurance available to every American – and laying the foundation for a brighter future for generations to come."
Interrupted by Tea Party protesters , Pelosi shot back, "Thank you, insurance companies of America."
MyDD :: Opt-out option is brilliant politics for the future?
For future state gains, I have a general idea that security rectify with an opt-out option is higher to one with a necessary adoption by all states, and I'd like to identify of flaws in this conception. Let's surmise it passes Congress and is signed into law in this put together.
As a a reflexive sortie, these states will opt out: Idaho, Utah, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina. Perchance South Dakota and one or two more. All states with either low populations or lots of people in meagreness.
Those states outstanding in will stamp a "copiousness husky" every Tom option to have clout. Let's arrogate again that the PO will have the desired effects where it is in strength, and security companies will be tight-fisted enough to call upon the people in opt-out states--if not, my line of reasoning is weakened.
This is the frippery that Republicans have waiting. People in the opt-out states will see that others are enjoying benefits that they cannot get, and their governments will have to by them, try to communicate individualistic collectives (too flat to be paraphernalia), or opt back in. Any choosing is respectable for Democrats. A demanded opt-in would acknowledge Republicans in those states to complain forever.
Today I expert, from the Diane Rehm NPR show how shallow a dispense the admitted option very is. Estimated by the CBO to put on only 10M - 12M Americans since, if you have owner-based guarantee nearby, the "collective get together" is not within reach to you, and the PO is decent one option in the collect. So (rhetorically), what's the flurry?
Re: Diane Rehm ( 2.00 / 1 )I also listened, but took most of the gamble for what is was good. The PO will want years to develope the infrastructure, very recently as Medicare and each of its enhancements did. This includes the pre-existing conditio coverage demand, btw. Morons will see this as a dereliction, of process... can't do much about that.
Finally, the PO will let the wage-slaves to drainage their corporate masters. This is what is seditious about the PO in any convention that makes a competitive non-business linked practice. That's what extraordinarily scares the bad-guys.
...News
Pelosi pivots to center on healthcare -- is this what the Founders had in mind?Los Angeles Times - Oct 29, 2009
The Associated PressHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi caved this morning, conceding to centrist realities, abandoning the "robust" public option for healthcare that she had trumpeted House Dems unveil $894 billion health care billPelosi Unveils House Health Care BillPelosi Unveils $894 Billion House Health Overhaul Bill; Expands Coverage To 36 -all 1,625 news articles »
Philadelphia Inquirer - Oct 28, 2009
FOXNewsUncertain future for Reid's planParty dissenters may vote to allow debate, but not to enact a health plan with a public option. By Shailagh Murray, Ben Pershing, and Lori Montgomery Health Reform: Look How Far We've Come. Now Where the Heck Are We?Will Reid Retreat? Resistance to Government Health Plan Could Force CompromiseWRAPUP 2-us Senate healthcare bill draws skeptics, opponents - -all 2,253 news articles »
USA Today - Oct 29, 2009
The Finn's future is one of the major talking points in Abu Dhabi, with the 2010 driver market very fluid. Nico Rosberg confirmed Thursday he would be and more »CBS News - Oct 29, 2009
Washington PostMitt Romney of Massachusetts, a once and future presidential prospect, appeared with McDonnell, Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling and attorney general hopeful Ken First thoughts: Obama visits DoverStrategy Memo: The UnveilingPolitics Today: Finding the Votes for Health Careall 898 news articles »
NYU Local - Oct 29, 2009
CNBCSee, even when Lieberman is stabbing him in the back over an issue that he's staking his political future on, Reid just can't resist the temptation to jam Flip-flop: Lieberman promised 'universal health care' in 2006Public likes public option for healthcare. Joe Lieberman doesn't.HEY HARRY REID! GRAB YOUR BALLS AND DUMP CRAZY JOE LIEBERMANall 134 news articles »